CO129-459 - Individuals - 1919 — Page 86

p. p

**

ecord .99.

32.

84

authorised by reason of the prison Ordinance 1999

1899) and the regulations made under that Ordinance (the

material parts of such Urdinance are set out in the Appendi #

to the Respondents Case)

On the 12th June judgment was given by the Court discusg=

ing the action. The learned Judges held that the proceedings

had been in accordance with the Deportation Ordinance. They

my thy

further held that the Deportation Ordinance was valid.

respect to the Appellant's claim for assault they held that

the acts complained of did not constitute ar assault and

also that they were authorised under the Prison Ordinance

1899 and the Prison Regulations. The reasons of the learned_

Judges will be found set out at pages 99 to 126 of the

Hecord.

35.

Against this decision the present appeal is being preferre

34.

The Respondente humbly submit that the said Appeal should

be disgrased for the following

REASONS

1.

BECAUSE the Deportation Ordinance 1917 was a valid

Ordinance duly enacted.

2.

BECAUSE the proceedings of the Respondents were duly

taken under the said ürdinance.